The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy microreview
(crossposted, with modifications) It’s a damn good film. It’s a very different thing from the book, but it is very respectful to the work and feels very much like Douglas’s handiwork.
For me, the Hitchhiker’s series carries a central theme of wide-eyed wonder about the utter enormity of the universe, and a warmhearted and innocent appreciation of the miraculousness of finding happiness despite the staggering odds against it. This movie absolutely knocked both of these points out of the park. There’s an extended sequence in the second half of the film that had my mouth hanging open for a good long while.
I got the distinct feeling that the audience at the theater I went to (Azalea Square in Summerville) didn’t get it. There was a small contingent of fans on one side of the theater that laughed constantly, but the rest could only manage an occasional murmur. Quite a few were displeased. I had to concentrate hard to keep from whipping out the double deuce on some chump behind me. During a key (and hilarious) scene, he said “Could this get any dumber?” Fume.
I had mixed feelings about the Guide segments; by themselves they were absolutely brilliant, but they did tend to kill the pacing. Overall I liked the casting, Martin Freeman especially (I think he was grown in a vat to play Arthur).
High points: The opening musical number, the Magrathea planetary yards (I just couldn’t help gaping at that), “I’m a sofa”.
Low points: The lemon helmet thing didn’t do it for me. The double titles. Pacing, like I said before. Also, wasn’t there supposed to be a Serenity trailer attached? I did get there a little late, maybe I missed it.
If you’re wondering, I brought a towel. (It was a paper towel. I sacrificed some utility for portability.)
–riney






***********Possible Spoilers Ahead********
****Just thought I would be nice to people who might happen to read this and haven’t seen the movie*****
I have to agree fully with this review. The same thing happened in the theater I attended. You could tell who had read the books and who hadn’t. I believe the reason the movie was so different from the books were due to the fact that Adams himself had wanted it to be so. He didn’t want the movie to be a direct adaptation due to the fact that the people who read the books already would feel like they were just reliving them again. While, not a bad thing, it wouldn’t give the viewer a new experience. It was bothering me where I had seen Trillian before but I finally realized (She played the girl from Elf.) If you looked closely in the scene on Vogosphere in the line you can see the original Marvin from the BBC television series. Overall, I would have to say I was very satisfied with the film. It wasn’t as funny as all of the books but that’s because the books had a more long-running humor quality that depended on narration mainly that would be difficult, if not impossible, to translate to film. I was glad they included some elements, and wished there were others too. I thought Ford’s character was greatly minimized in place of Zaphod’s but Marvin was done incredibly well. (Poor Vogon’s, if only they didn’t know the despair that is Marvin’s personality.) I wished it was longer so they could encompass everything but that would require a 10 hour movie to get it all in and there is no way that would have happened. Oh well. Not dissapointed in the least though.